
- Dr. Richard J. Beauchesne & Yves Cardinal Congar, O.P., Paris, May 21, 1975
Yves Congar: Mon Journal du Concile, I
(Paris: Cerf – 2002), pp. 71-72
History of ecclesiological idea: expansion of papal authority and mariology
(English Translation / French original below)
I have greatly studied the history of ecclesiological ideas and that of the expansion of papal authority. I am very much struck that a process similar to that played regarding papal authority is similarly played today with regard [to the study of] mariology. These are the same procedures, the same process. In both cases [papal authority and mariology], an enormous excrescence is built on two or three [scriptural] texts regarding which one is not sure that the original meaning is the one which is being given today or regarding which the ancient tradition had not considered the many meanings given today to such texts, not even considering the possibility that, sometimes, tradition may have accepted opposite meanings. We repeat to satiety, Tu es Petrus(1), or gratia plena(2), stabat(3), conteret caput tuum(4), etc.
In both cases [regarding papal authority and mariology], we continue to use persistently, tirelessly, patiently, throughout the centuries, small textual additions which, at the time, seem to be of little importance. [Regarding these additions], one may not be comfortable, or perhaps may even disagree with; but, [such uncomfortableness or disagreement] does not lead to a schism; not even a simple resistence will emerge for so little. (Yves Congar: Mon Journal du Concile-I-p. 71)
In both cases [that of papal authority and mariology], there is only one purpose (one idea): to increase, to bring to its maximum be it a power [papal authority], or be it a glory [mariology]. In both cases, we think only of the latter [i.e., to increase and to bring to its maximum both the power and the glory] and we use all the means available to attain this goal. In both cases, the adherents of this process demonstrate to you that having admitted ‘this’, you cannot deny ‘that’; having gotten to three, you cannot not get to ten [i.e., the maximum]…. In both cases, we never let go of any acquisition; we only go on adding to them [i.e., the acquisitions]. (Yves Congar: Mon Journal du Concile-I-p. 72)
_______________________________________________________________________